The public service name is still being tested. The proposed scope is bounded: one decision question, one context, proportionate methods, traceable evidence and accountable human review.
Evidence status: delivery-designed and not yet validated through a client engagement. A first conversation is a fit discussion, not commencement of work or evidence intake.
Scope
Start with the decision—not a mandatory method
A useful boundary names the decision question, organizational context, observation window, intended use, evidence authority and stop conditions. Workflow, network, information-flow and other methods are selected only when they fit the question.
What returns
A seven-part decision package
System map
The bounded path from conditions and evidence to action and feedback.
Evidence register
Coverage, provenance, uncertainty and missingness.
Findings
Observations, interpretations and hypotheses kept distinct.
Alternatives
Counter-evidence and explanations that could change the view.
Risk questions
Friction and dependency hypotheses requiring judgment.
Options
Proportionate interventions or measurements with trade-offs.
Decision readout
An explicit stop, proceed, investigate or measure recommendation.
Included discipline
Evidence before certainty
Question-first method selection
Provenance and uncertainty retained
Alternative interpretations preserved
Human review before consequential use
Not included
No diagnostic inflation
No whole-organization truth from a bounded sample
No employee performance, trust or intent scoring
No guaranteed outcome, causality or ROI
No automatic restructuring, automation or implementation
Assess fit
Is there one decision worth making reviewable?
No confidential material is needed for the first conversation.