Provisional engagement descriptor

Review one consequential decision system.

The public service name is still being tested. The proposed scope is bounded: one decision question, one context, proportionate methods, traceable evidence and accountable human review.

Evidence status: delivery-designed and not yet validated through a client engagement. A first conversation is a fit discussion, not commencement of work or evidence intake.

Start with the decision—not a mandatory method

A useful boundary names the decision question, organizational context, observation window, intended use, evidence authority and stop conditions. Workflow, network, information-flow and other methods are selected only when they fit the question.

A seven-part decision package

System map

The bounded path from conditions and evidence to action and feedback.

Evidence register

Coverage, provenance, uncertainty and missingness.

Findings

Observations, interpretations and hypotheses kept distinct.

Alternatives

Counter-evidence and explanations that could change the view.

Risk questions

Friction and dependency hypotheses requiring judgment.

Options

Proportionate interventions or measurements with trade-offs.

Decision readout

An explicit stop, proceed, investigate or measure recommendation.

Evidence before certainty

  • Question-first method selection
  • Provenance and uncertainty retained
  • Alternative interpretations preserved
  • Human review before consequential use

No diagnostic inflation

  • No whole-organization truth from a bounded sample
  • No employee performance, trust or intent scoring
  • No guaranteed outcome, causality or ROI
  • No automatic restructuring, automation or implementation

Is there one decision worth making reviewable?

No confidential material is needed for the first conversation.

Discuss a decision